Stop the Presses: Criticism Against the New York Times Mounts as Newspaper Is Accused of Killing 59 Million Trees Annually

After the New York Times (NYT) revealed an editorial about bitcoin mining, claiming the business is dangerous to the surroundings, a company referred to as Stop the Presses took problem with the Times’ paper utilization. Stop the Presses launched a social media marketing campaign in opposition to the NYT’s newspaper manufacturing. The group’s web site, nytimesup.org, alleges that the corporate “kills approximately 59 million trees per year.”

Activists Blast New York Times Over Physical Newspaper Print Production

On April 10, 2023, the New York Times faced criticism for publishing a one-sided “hit piece” on bitcoin mining. Crypto proponents claimed that Times reporter Gabriel Dance didn’t use factual info. Since then, the main focus has shifted to the environmental affect of the American information outlet, based in 1851, because of its newspaper manufacturing.

A gaggle referred to as Stop the Presses launched a social media campaign and website exposing the information enterprise’s present printing practices. The accusation is that the New York Times destroys a major variety of timber to provide its antiquated bodily paper in a digital world.

“The New York Times kills approximately 59 million trees per year,” the web site nytimesup.org particulars. “They kill these trees just to turn them into a newspaper that most people throw away, creating billions of pounds of CO2 each year. They print propaganda on the paper they create with dead trees, yet we live in a digital age. This wasteful practice must be stopped.”

NYTimes Bitcoin Hit Piece Backfires As #StopThePresses Movement Erupts On Social Media https://t.co/H21dbyUUbW

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) April 18, 2023

Many others share the same sentiment as Stop the Presses. Several individuals are sharing pictures and knowledge on the topic whereas tagging the NYT Twitter account so the corporate notices the grievances. One particular person estimates that if the New York Times kills 59 million timber yearly, they create “2.832 billion pounds of CO2 annually.” The individual notes that it’s even worse when combining the 171 years of newspaper supply.

“That means they’ve murdered over 10 billion trees and created over 484 billion pounds of CO2,” the person emphasized. The variety of timber used to create The New York Times since 1851 doesn’t account for the CO2 used within the firm’s 27 newspaper printing locations for manufacturing functions.

Furthermore, it doesn’t account for the supply course of and all of the fossil fuels used to move the newspaper to shops. The NYT even encompasses a 2009 article in regards to the topic, and the writer acknowledges that bodily newspapers trigger a major quantity of greenhouse gasoline emissions.

Citing an educational paper from 2004, New York Times contributor Tom Zeller Jr. explains that the examine’s conclusion notes that “receiving the news on a PDA results in significant reductions in the release of carbon dioxide, water, nitrogen, and sulfur oxides.”

In one other New York Times article revealed in 2018 by Farhad Manjoo, the writer explains how he took time without work from studying digital information to learn the bodily paper for 2 months. Interestingly, Manjoo claims it was a “surprise blessing” regardless that he acknowledges that print “presents a narrower mix of ideas than you find online.”

The blessing, Manjoo stated, regardless of getting information that may be a day previous because of the printing and supply delay, was that “hundreds of experienced professionals had done the hard work” for him. The NYT has not responded publicly to any of the criticism stemming from Stop the Presses and different activists.

In more moderen instances, the paper’s social media account with 55 million followers has misplaced its verification checkmark on Twitter. Physical print newspapers have declined over the past decade, and over the past two years, print subscribers have dropped by 7%. Data additional exhibits that from 2005 to 2021, roughly 2,200 American print newspapers failed, with the majority of today’s readership migrating to digital media.

What are your ideas on the environmental affect of bodily newspapers in a digital age, and do you imagine that main information shops like The New York Times ought to shift their focus solely to digital media? Share your ideas about this topic within the feedback part under.