Ripple Asks Judge to Deny SEC’s New Discovery Requests Concerning XRP

Ripple Labs has opposed the requests by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for post-compliant discovery regarding XRP. Ripple argued that the regulator’s requests are “premature” and “the SEC has did not justify every of its requests on the deserves.” Moreover, the crypto agency said that “the data the SEC seeks has no bearing on the courtroom’s treatments willpower.”

SEC Seeks More Information From Ripple Regarding XRP

In response to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s movement to compel sure post-compliant discovery relating to XRP, Ripple Labs despatched a letter to Judge Sarah Netburn on Friday, firmly opposing the SEC’s requests.

The SEC desires Ripple to supply audited monetary statements for 2022 and 2023 in addition to all post-complaint contracts for the sale or switch of XRP to non-employee counterparties. The company additionally calls for Ripple reply an interrogatory concerning the quantity of “XRP institutional gross sales proceeds” obtained after the criticism submitting for sure contracts.

In the letter to Judge Netburn, Ripple’s authorized counsel defined that the crypto agency opposes the SEC’s requests for 2 essential causes. “First, they’re premature,” the counsel said, emphasizing that the SEC “had ample alternative to hunt a lot of the requested discovery whereas truth discovery was open, failed to take action, and lacks good trigger to take action now.” The counsel continued:

Second, the SEC has did not justify every of its requests on the deserves. They are irrelevant: the data the SEC seeks has no bearing on the Court’s treatments willpower.

Ripple asserted that the SEC seeks a shortcut on funding contract claims, aiming for a abstract judgment as a substitute of a full listening to, cautioning that this bypasses essential fact-finding, dangers a second discovery section, and burdens each events and the courtroom.

The counsel additional famous: “Worse, the SEC’s abstract process would deprive Ripple of protections that may usually apply to a pre-suit investigation of recent conduct and the method afforded by the submitting of recent claims. And lastly, as to the SEC’s interrogatory specifically, the SEC has used all of its interrogatories within the case and can’t unilaterally grant itself extra.”

The letter additionally highlights the ruling by Judge Analisa Torres on July 13 final yr, holding partially that Ripple’s programmatic gross sales of XRP and different distributions didn’t quantity to funding contracts however that sure institutional gross sales of XRP to classy people and entities ought to have been registered as securities.

Ripple additional argued that “Besides being premature, the SEC’s discovery requests search data that’s irrelevant to treatments.” The counsel careworn that “Ripple’s present monetary situation will not be related to the quantity of penalties the Court ought to order,” emphasizing that “Ripple will not be claiming an incapacity to pay and won’t argue in favor of a discount in penalty quantity on account of its current monetary situation.” The letter concludes:

The SEC’s request for irrelevant and burdensome post-complaint discovery, particularly given the shut of truth discovery, needs to be denied.

Do you suppose the courtroom ought to deny the SEC’s requests for post-compliant discovery regarding XRP? Let us know within the feedback part under.