Does it shock you that it is technically doable for a $1 buy of an asset to shoot the market cap up by a trillion {dollars}, or for a $100 billion buy to not transfer the worth by a single penny? Many misunderstand the mechanism that truly drives worth actions. Let me clarify.


Lots of people appear to have misconceptions like considering if x {dollars} circulation into an asset, its market cap will go up by x {dollars}. In truth, it’s not doable to find out how a lot cash has been put in to an asset primarily based on its market cap, or conversely how a lot a market cap will transfer when some amount of cash flows into or out of the asset.

Price is just a operate of the present state of the order books throughout all markets that record the asset.

Consider this: let's say the present worth of BTC on Binance is 50k. What does that basically imply? It merely implies that the very least expensive restrict promote order at present on their order books is for 50k. That's what worth means definitionally, proper? Price is simply the quantity it’s important to pay to purchase one thing, so on a CEX worth is at all times merely the present least expensive restrict promote.

Example 1: Huge Purchase with No Effect on Market Cap

Let's say that the present worth of BTC on Binance is $50k, and the individual at present keen to promote at 50k (and who’s thus the individual at present defining the Binance worth of BTC) is a whale who’s providing 1000 BTC at 50k. Let's say I’m a whale purchaser and I’m put in a market order for 999 BTC. Well, I’ll find yourself shopping for all 999 from the whale vendor, leaving them with 1 BTC nonetheless on the market at 50k. Since they’re nonetheless promoting 1 BTC at 50k, the worth of BTC on Binance continues to be 50k. So I simply purchased practically $50 million value of BTC however the worth (and subsequently the market cap) didn't transfer by even a penny.

Example 2: Tiny Purchase with Huge Impact on Market Cap

Now think about one other state of affairs. The present worth of BTC on Binance is 50k, as a result of the present least expensive restrict promote is somebody promoting 0.01 BTC on the worth of 50k. Let's say I determine to purchase 0.02 BTC. Well, half of that can come from the individual promoting 0.01 at 50k, which implies I’ll eat that vendor. The worth of BTC on Binance will now teleport to regardless of the subsequent least expensive restrict order is for (that is the mechanism by which worth goes up when folks purchase). Since BTC may be very excessive liquidity (which implies plenty of restrict orders on the books packed densely throughout the worth spectrum), the subsequent least expensive restrict promote after the 0.01 BTC at 50k would in all probability be at like 50.00001k. But, for the sake of the instance, let's think about a extra excessive state of affairs wherein BTC liquidity is extraordinarily low so the subsequent least expensive supply after the 0.01 at 50k is at 50.5k, totally 1% dearer. Ok, properly, I find yourself getting 0.01 BTC at 50k, and one other 0.01 BTC at 50.5k, fulfilling my market order and leaving the worth of BTC on Binance at 50.5k. So, I’ve spent about $1000, however I moved the worth of BTC by 1%, which implies my buy of $1000 elevated the BTC market cap by practically $10 billion.

Closing Thoughts

Now, I’ve been type of glossing over the truth that for BTC and most cryptos, they’re listed on many unbiased order books without delay (one for every CEX), so an asset technically has as many various costs as markets that record it. So, should you induced a large outsized worth spike on Binance for a scorching second as a consequence of an especially illiquid market, you didn't truly spike "the" worth of BTC by that quantity, you simply spiked the worth of BTC on Binance by that quantity. "The" worth of BTC as reported on one thing like CoinGecko is simply is only a weighted common of the costs in all of the totally different markets. In actuality, all of the issues I’ve described on this submit are occurring independently in each marketplace for one asset like BTC, after which the costs throughout these markets are stored in sync as a consequence of arbitrage.

There are additionally markets that record BTC with out utilizing the order guide construction. These are referred to as DEXes (decentralized exchanges), and are the bread and butter of DeFi. If you'd prefer to know intimately how costs work with DEXes and liquidity swimming pools, you may learn my submit on that matter here. For the context of this submit, although, all it’s worthwhile to know is that DEX costs are stored according to CEX costs as a consequence of arbitrage merchants buying and selling liquidity swimming pools towards CEX costs. So, mainly, CEX order books do 99% of the first shifting of costs, after which DEX costs are mainly a mirrored image of CEX costs.

There you have got it, that’s how costs truly transfer. It's not doable to understand how a lot a given purchase or promote will transfer a market cap except you realize the precise state of the order books at that second on the change you're promoting on, in addition to the quantity of arbitrage friction between all markets.

submitted by /u/pseudoHappyHippy
[link] [comments]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: